LABORATORY OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND REHABILITATION

Module LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND REHABILITATION

Develop in students the skills necessary for the design and restoration of green areas through the use of appropriate graphic representation tools.

Lectures (28 hours) and exercises (discussion of case studies or guided tours, reports, papers or individual research carried out by students, group work, didactic experiences in the field, in-depth seminars) (28 hours). If the teaching is given in a mixed or remote mode, the necessary changes may be introduced with respect to what was previously stated, in order to comply with the program envisaged and reported in the syllabus.

Information for students with disabilities and / or SLD:

To guarantee equal opportunities and in compliance with the laws in force, interested students can ask for a personal interview in order to plan any compensatory and / or dispensatory measures, based on the didactic objectives and specific needs.

It is also possible to contact the referent professor ClnAP (Center for Active and Participated Inclusion - Services for Disabilities and / or SLD) of our Department, Prof. Giovanna Tropea Garzia and Anna De Angelis.

2. Design fundamentals with particular reference to green spaces and their restoration

2.1 The green system - Text n. 4, text n. 5

2.2 The preliminary phases if the project - lecture notes by the teacher, text n. 4

2.3 From functional and distributive schemes to the eidotype lecture - notes by the teacher, text n. 3

2.4 Technical design elements - text n. 4, text n. 5, text n. 6

3. Examples of park design and degraded areas - lecture notes by the teacher, text n. 7, 8, 9, 10

4 IT for planning and to design lecture notes by the teacher, text n. 4

1. Cianci, Maria Grazia. 2008. La rappresentazione del paesaggio : metodi, strumenti e procedure per l'analisi e la rappresentazione del paesaggio. Firenze : Alinea Editrice.
2. AA.VV. 1999. Disegnare il verde: esempi e tipologie di rappresentazione grafica del verde. Firenze : Alinea Editrice.
3. Reid, Grant W. 2002. Landscape graphics: plan, section, and perspective drawing of landscape spaces. Watson-Guptill Publications.
4. Toccolini, Alessandro. 2003. Piano e progetto di area verde : manuale di progettazione : il sistema delle aree verdi, parchi e giardini pubblici e privati, percorsi verdi. Maggioli Editore: Ambiente & territorio.
5. Stevens, David; Harpur, Jerry. 2003. Disegnare il giardino: idee, arredi e piante per piccoli spazi verdi. Edizioni Calderini de Il Sole 24 ore Edagricole
6. Dassori, Enrico, Morbiducci, Renata. 2010. Costruire l’architettura: tecniche e tecnologie per il progetto. Tecniche nuove. Milano.
7. Kipar, Andreas. 2003. Architetture del paesaggio : l'architettura del paesaggio attraverso un racconto di concorsi, idee, e progetti. Il verde editoriale, Milano.
8. Maniglio Calcagno, Annalisa. 1983. Architettura del paesaggio. Evoluzione storica. Calderini
9. Maniglio Calcagno, Annalisa. 2016. Architettura del paesaggio. Evoluzione storica Nuova edizione aggiornata. Franco Angeli
10. Leonardi, Mariagrazia. 2022. Progetto del paesaggio urbano e memoria archeologica. Aracne

OTHER EDUCATIONAL MATERIAL

Didactic material distributed by the teacher during the lessons. The teaching material will be published on a special web page built on Teams MS sharepoint accessible to students enrolled in the course.

The delivery of the paper object of the exercise and an individual interview will be the subject of the final evaluation of the students. 

Ongoing tests: development and subsequent display of concept maps relating to the topics covered during the lectures of the course.

Verification of learning takes place through an oral interview. The evaluation of the student's preparation will take place on the basis of the following criteria: learning ability and level of depth of the topics covered, properties of synthesis and exposition, and the student's ability to reason.

The vote follows the following scheme:

Unsuitable

Knowledge and understanding of the topic: Important shortcomings. Significant inaccuracies

Analysis and synthesis skills: Irrelevant. Frequent generalizations. Inability to synthesize

Use of references: Completely inappropriate

18-20

Knowledge and understanding of the topic: At the threshold level. Obvious imperfections

Ability to analyze and synthesize: Just enough skills

Use of references: As appropriate

21-23

Knowledge and understanding of the topic: Routine knowledge Analysis and synthesis skills: It is capable of correct analysis and synthesis. Argue logically and consistently

Use of references: Use standard references

24-26

Knowledge and understanding of the topic: Good knowledge

Analysis and synthesis skills: Has good analysis and synthesis skills. The arguments are expressed consistently

Use of references: Use standard references

27-29

Knowledge and understanding of the topic: Knowledge more than good

Ability to analyze and synthesize: He has considerable abilities of analysis and synthesis

Use of references: Has explored the topics

30-30L

Knowledge and understanding of the topic: Excellent knowledge

Ability to analyze and synthesize: He has considerable abilities of analysis and synthesis.

Use of references: Important insights.

- Eighteenth Century Parks;

- Preliminary phases of the design; - Technical design elements; - Techniques of graphic representation if the landscape.