ECONOMY AND MECHANIZATION FOR PRECISION FARMINGModule Economics and management of innovations
Academic Year 2025/2026 - Teacher: BIAGIO PECORINOCourse Structure
Classroom teaching will be conducted using slides prepared by the instructor on individual topics, which will be provided to students.
Each lesson will address methodological aspects and be accompanied by examples that can be applied within institutions and businesses in the agri-food system.
To ensure equal opportunities and in compliance with applicable laws, interested students may request a personal interview to plan any compensatory and/or extenuating measures, based on their educational objectives and specific needs.
Students may also contact the CInAP (Center for Active and Participatory Integration - Services for Disabilities and/or DSA) contact teacher in our Department, Professor Anna De Angelis.Learning Assessment
Learning Assessment Procedures
The grading scheme is as follows:
o Unsatisfactory
Knowledge and understanding: serious gaps and significant inaccuracies
Analysis and synthesis: irrelevant, frequent generalizations, inability to synthesize
Use of references: completely inappropriate
o 18–20
Knowledge and understanding: minimal, with obvious imperfections
Analysis and synthesis: barely adequate
Use of references: barely appropriate
o 21–23
Knowledge and understanding: routine
Analysis and synthesis: correct, logical and coherent argumentation
Use of references: standard
o 24–26
Knowledge and understanding: good
Analysis and synthesis: good, coherent presentation
Use of references: standard
o 27–29
Knowledge and understanding: more than good
Analysis and Summary: Remarkable
Use of References: With Further Information
or 30–30L
Knowledge and Comprehension: Excellent
Analysis and Synthesis: Excellent
Use of References: Significant Further Information
o Unsatisfactory
Knowledge and understanding: serious gaps and significant inaccuracies
Analysis and synthesis: irrelevant, frequent generalizations, inability to synthesize
Use of references: completely inappropriate
o 18–20
Knowledge and understanding: minimal, with obvious imperfections
Analysis and synthesis: barely adequate
Use of references: barely appropriate
o 21–23
Knowledge and understanding: routine
Analysis and synthesis: correct, logical and coherent argumentation
Use of references: standard
o 24–26
Knowledge and understanding: good
Analysis and synthesis: good, coherent presentation
Use of references: standard
o 27–29
Knowledge and understanding: more than good
Analysis and Summary: Remarkable
Use of References: With Further Information
or 30–30L
Knowledge and Comprehension: Excellent
Analysis and Synthesis: Excellent
Use of References: Significant Further Information